|
|
|
|
| |
 
Too many companies seem to be “breaking”, rather than
making it. As Foster and Kaplan report in Creative Destruction,
almost no company in history has managed to beat the S & P 500
for more than 15 years.
In our twelve years of experience with individual and organizational
change, we have identified a set of productivity killers which are
derived from an obsolete mental model--we call it unilateral control
(see Shifting
From Unilateral Control to Mutual Learning). In order to develop
productivity enhancing behaviors, it is imperative to “upgrade”
the individual and organizational culture towards a mutual learning
orientation.
Some of the ineffective behaviors or Productivity Killers? driving
poor results include:
| • |
Victim Attitude. People attribute failure to factors outside of their control, giving up power for the sake of innocence. Blame-ability trumps response-ability and finger-pointing substitutes corrective action. Employees blame bosses, “My project is late because they didn’t give me the resources
I needed…” Bosses blame employees, “My staff is not proactive or competent; I need better people!”
Bottom line: If you don’t see yourself as part of the problem, you can’t see yourself as part of the solution.
|
| • |
Undiscussable Issues. Conversations are polite exchanges where people discuss only “safe” fluff, while the tough core issues remain unaddressed and fester in the dark. In a hallway conversation people might comment something like “Marketing is getting too many resources, isn’t it a coincidence that its director is the Chairman’s son in law?”
Bottom line:
Unspeakable issues keep building underneath the table, festering relations and preventing growth. Hallway and behind the scenes conversations multiply.
|
| • |
Narcissistic Negotiation. People focus on being right, getting what they want and “beating” their “adversary” in a win-lose battle. Big egos get in the way and prevent the identification of underlying interests that can unleash creative solutions for the situation at hand. “I’d rather win over you than win with you”.
Bottom line: Nobody ever asks for what they really want (interests), people ask for what they think will give them what they really want (position). It’s much more creative to bypass the latter and focus on satisfying the former.
|
| • |
Broken Commitments. People agree to fulfill requests without assessing whether they have the skills and resources to do it, then default on their commitments without any warning, explanation or apology. “Next week? Sure; I can do that… (maybe I can, maybe I can’t,
we’ll just have to see…)”.
Bottom line: Lack of integrity destroys effective coordination, trust and values.
|
| • |
Unethical Practices. What’s right equals what you can get away with. “Let’s cook the numbers--just a little bit. If nobody catches us, it is not wrong.”
Bottom line:
When integrity is routinely compromised in the pursuit of success it always results in criminal activity.
|
We share Jim Collins’s finding that “people are not
an organization’s most important asset; the right people are
an organization’s most important asset”. We believe
that “right people” means people with consistent values,
motivations and skills in the areas of personal effectiveness, interpersonal
relationships and leadership; people who can deal with both the
human and the technical dimensions of their jobs. Only when staffed
with these “right” people will companies be able to
cope with the complex situations they confront.
See complete list of Productivity Killers and Productivity Boosters™
Read
more about Jim Collins’ findings
|
|
|
  |
|
| |
| |
 |
| |
The Crisis is a Crisis of Consciousness by Fred Kofman This Q&A-style text exposes a dialogue between El ... |
 |
|
The World Economic Forum honored Andy Freire with the "Young Global Leaders" award
|
 |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
Presence: Human Purpose and the Field of the Future By Peter Senge, C. Otto Scharmer, Joseph J... |
|
| |
|
|
|